5 Differences Between The Results And Discussion Sections

5 Differences Between The Results And Discussion Sections In this example, the therapist has tried to make a connection between the affected person’s signs and stress. She didn't explicitly tell the patient “your symptoms are brought on by stress”. It can also be good follow to make a table that lists all your themes, subthemes, and associated quotes. Still, it could be helpful if we concentrate on each of them individually. You do this by outlining your statement first , after which commenting upon it. If your research has relied on observations, then your task was to watch a particular behaviour in a specific setting. Before reporting the results of your qualitative research, you have to recall what kind of analysis you've carried out. The most typical forms of qualitative research are interviews, observations, and focus teams â€" and your analysis is prone to fall into certainly one of these sorts. Reporting qualitative outcomes is much easier than reporting quantitative results, particularly since you don’t should take care of any statistics. Finally, you have to look at the outcomes of the Tests of Between-Subjects Effects . Below are some important ideas for reporting experimental, quantitative and qualitative research. In this Chapter, all of the experimental results from the phenomenological experiments outlined in Section 5.2 are presented and examined in detail. The results of the major working variables on the efficiency of the pilot filters are defined, and various implications for design are discussed. University assignments are a giant challenge, but we can information you. Get assist with all aspects of your assignment, from research to writing. Feel free to download a PDF version of this infographic and use it as a helpful reference while you're writing these two sections of your manuscript. Let’s say that you were observing how a therapist explains to sufferers that their situation is psychological quite than physiological. When reporting the results, you first need to categorise your observations. You need to make connections, and make obvious your causes for saying that knowledge must be interpreted in a technique rather than one other. Use these groups and headings to make a plan of the factors you need to make in your dialogue. These points should match into a framework that makes a coherent story of your findings. …the main task of writing entails working out how to make contextually grounded theoretical factors which might be viewed as a contribution by the related professional group of readers. For many kinds of research, the primary work of interpretation cannot be done until a lot of the knowledge has been collected and analysed. For others, the information already exists , and the work of decoding it begins much earlier in the analysis process. Our step-by-step information will take you thru the method, from planning to writing and publishing. Instead, she has guided him, by way of questions, to connect his symptoms to stress. This appears beneficial as a result of the patient has arrived at the hyperlink between stress and symptoms himself. Hopefully, this guide has lowered your worries and elevated your confidence that you can write up the outcomes part of your dissertation without too many difficulties. As an example, let’s say that your focus group dealt with figuring out the reason why some people favor Coca-Cola over Schweppes, and vice versa. You have transcribed your focus group sessions and have extracted themes from the data. You have discovered all kinds of reasons why individuals choose one of the two drinks.